Swearing Allegiance
Over the last few weeks, I’ve typed the words “swear allegiance” more often than I would have thought possible as I write the stories of the Empress Maud (aka Matilda, Lady of the English), Isabella of Castile, and Tamar of Georgia. In each case, a king forced his nobles to swear allegiance to his daughter in order to secure her inheritance to the throne.*
After I’d typed the words several dozen times and tried to find another way to describe the same act,** I found myself thinking about the American pledge of allegiance.*** And because I only have an article due, a grant proposal to write, a post that needs to go up on Illuminate, and a book chapter that is squirming in my hands like a kitten that doesn’t want to be held, I thought this was a fine time to go find out about the pledge.
My memories of saying the pledge are firmly rooted in grade school, though I presume the practice continued through my high school years. We stood at our desks, hands pressed against our chests in some approximation of where we thought our hearts were, and chorused the words along with a disembodied voice on the PA system. At the same time, two or three of the older students helped raise the flag on the pole in front of the building–I don’t remember how students were chosen, only that it was an honor and a thrilling experience.**** There were always one or two children who were exempted from the ritual due to parental objections–which were never discussed or explained. (A lost learning opportunity, Delaware Elementary.) My memory is that they stepped into the hall. But perhaps I made that up. Maybe they sat at their desks, observers rather than participants. Or maybe there were no conscientious pledge objectors.***** (I know a couple of my Delaware classmates hang out here in the Margins. If your memories are different than mine, feel free to share them in the comments or an email.)
When I headed into Historyland to find out the story behind the pledge of allegiance I had a vague feeling that it was relatively new. Well, yes and no.
In fact, the custom began earlier than I thought, thanks to a Baptist minister turned adman named Francis Bellamy.
Bellamy was a second-generation Baptist minister who found the pulpit didn’t quite fit. In 1891 he accepted a job in the promotion department of a Boston-based family magazine, Youth’s Companion. One of his first assignments was organizing a nation-wide patriotic program for schools to coincide with the opening ceremonies of the Columbian Exposition of 1892 on the four hundredth anniversary of Christopher Columbus’s arrival in the New World.****** A salute to the flag, recited by schoolchildren in unison, was intended as a key element of the ceremony.
Bellamy must have been a hustler. Thanks to Bellamy’s efforts, Congress passed a resolution endorsing the school ceremony amd President Benjamin Harrison declared Columbus Day a national holiday. He (Bellamy, not Harrison) also struggled to write the pledge that formed the basis of the one we say today. His version read “I pledge allegiance to my flag and the Republic for which it stands–one Nation indivisible–with liberty and justice for all.” (Two hours, twenty-two words. I feel his pain.)
Youth’s Companion published the text of the pledge and the salute to go with it. (Unlike today, the original salute began with the right hand over the heart and ended with something that sounds remarkably like the Nazi salute to Hitler.) The magazine also offered American flags for sale. After all, Bellamy was in the promotions department.
The first stage of the Bellamy salute, ca. 1899.
According to Youth’s Companion, millions of school children participated in the 1892 Columbus Day ceremony. Over the years, reciting the pledge became an accepted part of the school day across the country. Several state legislatures required public school children to recite the pledge every day. In the 1920s, the National Flag Convention dropped the “my” and added “of the United States of America” in case immigrant children were confused about which flag they were pledging allegiance to. (I couldn’t make this stuff up if I tried.) In the 1930s, school districts began to change the salute in response to concerns raised by parent and teacher associations, the Red Cross, and the Boy and Girl Scouts that the salute made Americans look like Nazi sympathizers.
See what I mean?
In 1942, fifty years after Bellamy wrote it, Congress adopted the pledge as part of a national flag code, including the modern version of the salute. In 1954, Congress created the version of the pledge that I grew up with, adding the phrase “under God” as a controversial Cold War response to “godless” communism. (Don’t ask me to explain why anyone thought this would be an effective countermeasure to anything.)
I don’t remember what I felt when I recited the pledge of allegiance as a child. As an adult, it brings a lump to my throat. Will that change, now that I know it started out as a promotional campaign tied to a problematic national holiday, with historical overtones of xenophobia? Probably not. The country that I pledge allegiance to is complicated. Its history has moments of glory as well as darkness. In my opinion, the important thing is to remember the darkness as well as the glory–and refuse to repeat old mistakes.
*It only worked in the case of Tamar of Georgia–and not very well in her case, now that I think about it.
**Swear fealty also works. Though it isn’t much of a change. All suggestions welcome.
***”But I digress” is a way of life.
****I felt a similar thrill earlier this year when My Own True Love and I helped raise the flag over Fort Sumter.
*****Memory is a tricky thing.
******The exposition took place in 1893. Stuff happens.
The World’s First Aviator?
‘Abbas Ibn Firnas is not well known in the west but he’s a hero to little boys and aviation buffs throughout the Arab-speaking world.
The Andalusian scientist was court poet and astronomer to Abd al-Rahman III in the days when Cordoba was the wealthiest and most civilized city in Europe. Like many Muslim scientists of the ninth and tenth centuries, he was a polymath. He produced a revised version of al-Khwarizmi’s astronomical tables that was later important in the development of European astronomy. He built an observatory, invented a metronome, and learned how to cut crystal. None of that makes him stand out among the polymaths of the Islamic golden age. (Leonardo da Vinci would have fit right in.)
Ibn Firnas’s fame depends on one moment in his productive and accomplished career. In 875 CE, at the age of sixty-five, Ibn Firnas tried to fly. Using a hang-glider made of feathers and wood that he built after hours of observing birds in flight, he leapt off the roof of the Rusafa palace in Cordoba. By all accounts, he flew for several minutes, gliding on the air currents like a raptor. He as able to adjust his altitude and change direction, but he hadn’t made any provision for landing. Badly injured in the inevitable crash, the scientist knew what he’d done wrong. He hadn’t paid enough attention to how birds use their tail feathers.
It would be the late nineteenth century before humans mastered the art of gliding like a hawk on wind thermals. It turned out Ibn Firnas was right. The tail was the key.
German aviation pioneer Otto Lillenthal in flight in 1895.
The Zimmermann Telegram-Part 2: What Did Mexico Do?
In my last post, I wrote about the Zimmermann Telegram and the role it played in convincing the United States to enter World War I. A couple of days later as I talked to a friend about the subject, I realized I had no idea how Mexico responded. It had never occurred to me to ask.* In fact, I didn’t know whether Mexico fought at all. Luckily, some answers aren’t hard to find if you think to ask the question.
In 1917, Mexico had enough on its hands. The country was in the throes of brutal civil war.** What began in 1910 as an uprising by urban intellectuals and liberals**** against the dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz developed into full-scale revolution dominated by peasants and workers. The revolution quickly splintered into factions, the most prominent of which were led by Pancho Villa, Emiliano Zapata, and Venustiano Carranza. New regimes rose and fell. Rebel leaders had other rebel leaders assassinated. In 1917, Carranza, elected president for a second time, presided over the creation of a new constitution–a contradictory document which gave him dictatorial powers but confirmed many of the reforms the rebels had been fighting for.
In addition to fighting among themselves, the succession of Mexican governments also had to deal with political interference and occasional low-grade invasions from the United States.***** At one point, United States forces occupied the port of Veracruz for a period of six months–a preview of the kind of trouble Mexico could expect if it allied itself with Germany
Instead of accepting the Zimmermann offer, Carranza used the threat to negotiate for recognition of its new government by the United States in exchange for neutrality.
Question answered. Next?
*Another historical blind spot uncovered. Sigh.
**Known in history books as the Mexican Revolution. When you think about it, revolutions are by definition civil wars.*** At least, actual military revolutions. Not, say, the Scientific Revolution.
***Which leads me to another question I’ve never thought about: Are all civil wars revolutions? Hmmmm. I throw the question out for discussion by the Marginalia.
****Often the case with revolutions. You let them read and they get ideas. This is why dictatorial regimes try to control the press, ban books, etc. But I digress.
*****Wilson was prepared to be an isolationist when it came to war in Europe, but not when civil war next door threatened American business interests or led to violence across the border. If you’re interested in learning more about America’s interference in the Mexican revolution I strongly recommend Jack Beatty’s The Lost History of 1914: The Year the Great War Began.