A Light in the Northern Sea: A Q & A with Tim Brady
I am fascinated by stories of the resistance in World War II. (My guess is that comes to no surprise to those of you who have been hanging out here in the Margins for a while.) And I have slowly come to realize that the resistance took different forms in different places. All of which explains why I said yes with no hesitation when I was offered an advance copy of Tim Brady’s A Light in the Northern Sea: Denmark’s Incredible Rescue of Their Jewish Citizens During WWII. (This despite the fact that I have been turning down most of the books publicists offer me because life is short and the To-Be-Read piles are tall.)
I’m glad I did: the story is amazing.
I’m also glad Tim Brady agreed to answer some questions. Take it away, Tim
What path led you to the story of the Danish resistance movement in World War II? And why do you think it is important to tell this story today?
After finishing Three Ordinary Girls, which told a story about the Dutch Resistance during WW II, I was looking for another resistance story to tell. I knew vaguely of what had happened in Denmark—the story of the rescue of the Danish Jews—but only at a surface level. When I decided to dive into research, I quickly realized what a powerful story it was. These early efforts were occurring just as Russia was invading Ukraine, which seemed like a very timely example for what happens when a powerful, authoritarian nation occupies a lesser power with democratic traditions.
The resistance in France and the Netherlands has been the subject of many books in English over the last few years, including your own Three Ordinary Girls. How did the Danish resistance differ from these better know experiences?
The Danish resistance was slow to begin. The German occupation began in April 1940, but as a consequence of the agreement signed by the Danish government at the time, the German takeover was less oppressive than occurred in other Western European nations, and a majority of Danes were not moved to resistance by the presence of Germany in their daily lives. It would take three years before an effective resistance evolved in Denmark.
Why do you think people are drawn to these stories today?
I think readers have grown more interested in the nooks and crannies of the history of World War II. While the great sweep of the war remains a powerful focus of its history, many are looking into lesser-known aspects of the conflict to get a better sense of what happened to a wide variety of its participants.
You introduce your readers to individual members of the resistance, who come to the work by different paths and carry out different missions. Do you have a favorite among them?
Jurgen Kieler and the whole of his family are great heroes of mine, and of much of the Danish nation. The Kieler’s alignment with and participation in the resistance grew out of a deep moral conviction that the German presence in Denmark could not be tolerated. They struggled within the family, particularly Jurgen and his older sister, Elsebet, in how best to respond to the oppressive nature of the occupation, before ultimately siding with a violent resistance. They paid deeply for their decision; four siblings, and their father, all spent time in concentration camps before the war ended.
Was there a story you were sad to leave out?
There was no one story that I was sad to leave out, but collectively I wished I had more opportunity to delve deeper into the story as a whole: more history of Denmark, extending back before the 20th century; more depth about the nature of the Danish character—what were the roots of their collective decision to come to the aid of the nation’s Jews? More understanding of the Danish monarchy and how it worked with the country’s democratic institutions. More details about particular aspects of the resistance like the rescue of the Jews through Bispebjerg and other hospitals in Copenhagen. More about the White Bus rescue— how it was organized and how it worked.
What was the most surprising thing you learned working on this book?
I would say the most surprising thing was the fact that I found the story was essentially as true as its reputation. I’m by nature, and probably by profession, skeptical when it comes to history stories that promise heroics and good deeds across a wide swath of a nation’s populace. While there are many footnotes and asterisks to go along with this story, I think it lives up to its reputation; the Danish people deserve a tip of the cap for what they did to rescue 95% of the country’s Jewish population from capture by Nazi Germany.
Tim Brady is an award-winning author whose books—Twelve Desperate Miles, A Death in San Pietro, His Father’s Son, and Three Ordinary Girls—have received wide critical acclaim. He has contributed to PBS history documentaries and has written frequently for the History Channel Magazine. He lives in St. Paul, Minnesota, and is a graduate of the Iowa Writers’ Workshop.
From the Archives–Word with a Past: Gerrymander
This post originally ran in 2018. Unfortunately, some stories never go out of date.

If Elbridge Gerry (1744-1814) had played his cards right, he could have been a minor but respected figure in American history. He signed the Declaration of Independence, helped draft the Bill of Rights, served two terms in Congress, and was the fifth Vice President of the United States. His contemporaries thought him intelligent, gentlemanly, quirky, and a bit of a hot-head.
Instead his name is permanently linked to the practice of re-drawing political districts for partisan advantage. In 1812, Gerry was a member of the Democratic-Republican party and the governor of Massachusetts. Although he had called for an end to partisan bickering in his inaugural address in 1810, he came to believe that the Federalist party was too close to the British and wanted to restore the monarchy. Gerry went on a partisan power binge. He removed Federalists from state government jobs and replaced them with Democratic-Republicans. He had his attorney-general prosecute Federalist newspapers editors for libel. He even seized control of the Federalist-dominated Harvard College board–presumably recognizing the college as the source of future American political leaders. (Though he may have just gotten carried away. Power is an addictive and intoxicating beverage.)
To put the cherry on the partisan sundae, his fellow Democratic-Republicans, who controlled the legislature, redrew the state’s Senate districts in a way that would benefit their party. Previously, Massachusetts’ senatorial districts followed country boundaries. The new senate map twisted and turned in irrational patterns to insure a Democratic-Republican victory. Gerry may not have been responsible for the map’s design, but he signed it into law in February, 1812.
The Federalist controlled Boston Gazette ran an illustration of the district map in the form of a salamander-like monster and ran it with the title “The Gerry-Mander,” claiming it had been born of “many fiery ebullitions of party spirit, many explosions of democratic wrath and fulminations of gubernatorial vengeance within the year past.”
There are better ways to have your name live on in the language: public toilets for example.
Gerrymander: To manipulate the boundaries of an electoral constituency so as to favor one party or class.
Word with a Past: Muckrakers
While I was writing about Rebecca Harding Davis (1831-1910), I started off thinking of her as a proto-muckraker, working a generation before people like Ray Stannard Baker (1870-1946),* Lincoln Steffens (1866-1936), Ida Tarbell (1857-1944) and Ida B. Wells (1862-1931). But the closer I looked, the more I realized that the realism for which she was known was not the same as the investigative reporting which earned the muckrakers their name. They exposed political and economic corruption–and related social hardships–that resulted from the growing power of big business in the Second Industrial Revolution. Corporate monopolies, political machines, unsafe working conditions, urban poverty, and child labor were all fair targets. Davis described the hardships, but she didn’t dig for the, well, muck.
- Ray Stannard Baker
- Lincoln Steffens
- Ida Tarbell
- Ida B. Wells
I sadly abandoned several lovely but incorrect sentences about Davis, and then treated myself to a little rabbit-holing. Here are the high, or possible low, points:
- The word muckrake entered English in 1366 as the name for a rake designed to collect and spread muck, referring to manure, not filth in general.
- John Bunyan was first the first to use the implement in a literary metaphor, noting in Pilgrim’s Progress that “The Man with the Muckrake could look no way but downward”—and that he consequently was unable to look up when offered a spiritual crown.
- Theodore Roosevelt used Bunyan’s words and imagery in a 1906 speech in which he exhorted the investigative journalists of his time to show moderation: “The men with the muck rakes are often indispensable to society; but only if they know when to stop raking the muck, and to look upward to the celestial crown above them, to the crowd of worthy endeavor. There are beautiful things above and round about them; and if they gradually grow to feel that the whole world is nothing but muck, their power of usefulness is gone.” (You can read the entire speech here . Personally, I think Roosevelt makes some good points.)
Roosevelt did not mean the term as a compliment, but many of the journalists of the time embraced it.
Muckraking as a movement disappeared between 1910 and 1912. The need for journalists willing to look down and the stir the, ahem, muck, did not.
*Who also wrote work that was the antithesis of muckraking using the name David Grayson. As Grayson, he wrote books of personal essays with titles like Adventures in Contentment, Adventures in Friendship, and The Friendly Road. He not only took on a different name for these books, he created an entirely different persona. Baker was an Amherst family man; Grayson a well-read bachelor who left the city to live on a modest farm. (Think an intellectual version of the 1960s television comedy Green Acres,** minus the glamorous wife and, presumably, Arnold Ziffel, the pig.) Grayson had serious fans: they formed clubs named after him and called themselves Graysonians, claiming to be dedicated to the simple life. On the other hand, as Baker he won a Pulitzer for his biography of Woodrow Wilson. Best of both writing worlds?
**My apologies to any of you who now can’t get the theme song out of your head.






