The Boston Massacre: A Family History
Those of you who’ve been hanging out here in the Margins for a while know that I love books that turn what we think about a historical subject upside down, or at the very least expand it.
Historian Serena Zabin does both in The Boston Massacre: A Family History.
Paul Revere’s iconic engraving of the “Boston Massacre” of 1770 shows colonists and soldiers facing each other across a clear divide, breached only by gunfire. Zabin argues that prior to the violence of March 5, 1770, the two groups were in fact linked together in complicated social, spatial, and and even familial relationships.
Zabin drills down into details of relationships between Bostonians and the unwelcome soldiers quartered in their midst in the years prior to the Boston Massacre. Many were housed in tents on Boston Commons, but others, especially men with families, rented rooms in Boston homes. All of them patronized Boston businesses. Beyond these casual points of connection, Zabin considers the effects of marriages, seductions and affairs. She looks at instances of members of one group serving as godparents for children of the other group, at roles played by soldiers’ wives, at soldiers working side jobs for Bostonians, and at pub brawls. She outlines the social relationships between British officers and the Bostonian elite.
Having established the depth and intricacy of these relationships, Zabin looks in detail at the events of March 5, 1770, the mass of contradictory accounts of those events, and the trials that followed. She demonstrates how attorneys on both sides erased those relationships from their arguments, creating their own versions of the gulf between Bostonians and British soldiers that appears in Revere’s engraving.
The Boston Massacre is a well-written and eye-opening addition to the social history of colonial America.
Most of this review appeared previously Shelf Awareness for Readers
Hospital Transport Ships in the American Civil War
I must admit, I did not expect to write another blog post about Civil War medicine any time soon. That’s not where my head is these days. But the recent mobilization of Navy hospital ships to help the embattled medical systems in New York and Los Angeles led an old friend and regular reader to ask me about hospital ships in the American Civil War.
This one’s for you, Tracy.
* * *
In the spring of 1862, General George McClellan was preparing to lead the Army of the Potomac in an amphibious advance on the Confederate capital through the Virginia Peninsula. It was clear to the Army’s Medical Bureau that this strategy would offer new challenges to a medical system that had been seriously overburdened from the first days of the war.* In addition to high battle casualties, field hospitals could expect large numbers of soldiers who succumbed to disease thanks to the peninsula’s malarial swamps. Moreover, the region’s terrain, with its swampy forests and miry roads, would make it difficult to transport wounded and sick men from the battlefield with horse-drawn wagons.
The obvious answer was a water-based evacuation system, but the army’s prior efforts at hospital transport ships had been a failure. Instead of trying again, the army contracted with the United States Sanitary Commission** to operate a semi-independent hospital transport system, using steamships to evacuate wounded and sick soldiers through the James and Pamunkey Rivers and then up the coast to Union hospitals. The army would provide a fleet of ships to serve as hospital transports. The Sanitary Commission would staff and supply them.
The Commission’s secretary, landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted, was the organizing force behind the project. Volunteer nurses were the engine that made it run. Olmsted envisioned the transport ships as being less like hospitals and more like a home away from home, where an injured soldier could rest and recover in relative ease, complete with women to prepare beds for incoming casualties, staff kitchens to prepare special diets for the ill and comfort the wounded—replicating in an institutional setting the middle-class domestic experience of nursing a family member at home.
According to volunteer nurse Katherine Prescott Wormeley, the reality fell far short of Olmsted’s vision:
“Imagine a great river or sound steamer filled on every deck—every berth and every square inch of room covered with wounded men; even the stairs and gangways and guards filled with those who are less badly wounded; and then imagine fifty well men, on every kind of errand, rushing to and fro over them, every touch bringing agony to the poor fellows, while stretcher after stretcher came along, hoping to find an empty place; and then imagine what it was to keep calm ourselves, and make sure that every man on both boats was properly refreshed and fed.”
Olmsted also envisioned the ships as a secure place for middle-class and elite women to volunteer away from the rough atmosphere of overcrowded military hospitals. That didn’t work out either. In reality, the nurses on the transport ships were closer to the battlefield than their counterparts in the military hospitals and saw some of the worst scenes of suffering of the war. The nurses often worked for two or three days with little sleep and ate meals snatched when the demands of duty allowed. They hauled buckets of water for cooking, cleaning, and laundry, cooked endless gallons of gruel and beef tea over spirit lamps, and commandeered supplies from military encampments whenever they got a chance. Not exactly the sheltered experience their families expected.
The Sanitary Commission hospital transport service plunged into action on May 4. (Like everything else that happened in the early days of the Civil War, they weren’t quite ready.) In the following weeks, the hospital ships transported thousands of sick and wounded men from the Virginia Peninsula to military hospitals in New York, Philadelphia, Washing, Annapolis, and Baltimore. In mid- July, Confederate gunboats began firing on the Sanitary Commission’s ships, removing the last illusion that the transport ships were safe. Olmsted refused to accept new female volunteers and began to demobilize his forces. By the end of the month, the commission had turned all responsibility for transporting casualties back to the Union army.
* * *
Hospital transport ships appeared in another guise on the Mississippi River, where a side-wheel steamer named the Red Rover was used as a hospital ship on an on-again, off-again basis.
* Thanks to the combination of an elderly and inflexible Surgeon General who took pride in paring his budget to the bone and a sudden massive increase in the size of the army.
**A civilian organization that offered its services to the Union as a medical watchdog group, with a mandate to inspect military camps and hospitals and the power to enforce sanitary regulations for the benefit of the soldiers. Lincoln reluctantly signed the order establishing the Commission on June 13, 1861—just in time to move into action when the first major battle of the war, the Battle of Bull Run ( or Manassas if you prefer), demonstrated that the United States Army’s Medical Bureau was totally unprepared for the sheer volume of the wounded and ill. (The Confederate Army’s medical system wasn’t in any better shape.)
Just for the record, the Commission basically highjacked Dr. Elizabeth Blackwell’s Women’s Central Association of Relief. A story that aggravates me so greatly that I may need to write one more Civil War medicine post just so I am not guilty of contributing to historical erasure. Don’t touch that dial.
A Game of Birds and Wolves
The Battle of the Atlantic was the longest continuous military campaign in World War II. German U-boats targeted convoys of British merchant ships and the naval vessels that escorted them, with the goal of starving Britain into submission. By the end of 1941, Germany was succeeding—a fact that was a closely guarded secret in Britain.
In A Game of Birds and Wolves: The Ingenious Young Women Whose Secret Board Game Helped Win World War II, journalist Simon Parkin tells the largely forgotten story of how Captain Gilbert Roberts, a retired naval officer brought back into service as a result of wartime manpower shortages, and a staff of young Wrens (Women’s Royal Naval Service) helped turn the tide of the war. Together Roberts and his unexpected team created successful anti-U-boat tactics and trained almost 5000 British naval officers in their use. Their method? A room-sized board game based on previously lost sea battles.
I loved this book, but the sub-title is deceptive. Parkin gives full credit to the Wrens for the key role they played in defeating the U-boats, but if you’re looking for a World War II version of Hidden Figures, you will be disappointed. A Game of Birds and Wolves is not an a addition to the growing genre of forgotten women’s history.
On the other hand, if you’re looking for well-told account of innovation and grace under pressure, this is the book for you. Parkin’s work is a powerful account of an under-told piece of World War II history, told from the perspectives of not only Roberts and his team of Wrens, but those of victims of U-boat attacks, Robert’s German counterpart, several U-boat commanders, and a number of British naval officers. It is smart, suspenseful, and occasionally heartbreaking.
A version of this review previously appeared in Shelf Awareness for Readers.



