Talking About Women’s History: Three Questions and an Answer with Etta Madden
I am delighted to kick off this year’s Women’s History Month series with Etta Madden. I don’t remember where we first met on line, but these days we cross paths about something—a book, an experience, garden produce*—almost every day.
In addition to being a kick-ass gardener, Etta is Professor of English at Missouri State University and the author of Engaging Italy: American Women’s Utopian Visions and Transnational Networks (Forthcoming, SUNY Press), Eating in Eden: Food and American Utopias (U Nebraska Press) and Bodies of Life: Shaker Literature and Literacies (Greenwood). She has also published numerous articles on American literature and intentional, spiritual communities in the US and in Italy.
In addition to a Fulbright award, she has been a research fellow at the New York Public Library and is two-time recipient of Mellon fellowships from the Library Company of Philadelphia.
Take it away, Etta!
One of the women you are writing about, Caroline Crane Marsh, is best known as the wife of American diplomat George Perkins Marsh. Are there special challenges to writing about a woman whose biography has been overshadowed by that of her husband? (Recognizing that George Perkins Marsh is not exactly a household name.)
That’s a great question. An acquisitions editor asked me a couple of years ago: Why do we need yet another story of “the woman behind the man”? Isn’t that done already? I wish I had been quick enough to retort, “Why do we need another story of the man in front of the woman?”
Seriously, people never tire of “coming-of-age,” “rags-to-riches,” “up-by-their-own bootstraps,” “underdog” and “outlier” stories. We have an insatiable desire to know, how did this successful person arrive at where they are? A key word here is “successful.” Many little-known women of the past aren’t viewed as successful and noteworthy because either no one knows their stories–or our standards of success differ from past measures. [I recall my shock at age eighteen, for example, when my mother told me she had been voted “most likely to succeed” in high school and, in her eyes, had succeeded—her goals were to be a wife and mother.]
With Caroline Crane Marsh, as you note, most people have never heard of her husband, although George Perkins Marsh was a US Congressman, an early environmentalist, a co-founder of the Smithsonian Institution, and a US Ambassador to Italy and to the Ottoman Empire for more than a quarter-century. A challenge with Caroline’s story, then, is necessarily raising her husband’s profile while primarily illuminating her strengths and the shadow in which she has remained. It’s impossible to tell her story without also discussing his. While several short and lengthy biographies of George exist (Caroline compiled George’s Life and Letters not long after his death in 1882), and Caroline makes momentary appearances within them, writers of women’s history know how different even George’s life would appear if the spotlight were focused on Caroline and her place within his “successful” and long career.
Specific to Caroline and her story: she left behind thousands of pages of letters and journals, poetry and prose that illuminate her life as an author and views of daily life as an ambassador’s wife. Really, she was an ambassador in her own right. As a translator—not merely of Italian but of French, German and Swedish, she mediated cultures. And she was the figure many women (and some men) abroad contacted with requests for help—because she was accessible at times when her husband was not. People sought her ear, expecting that she would share what she heard with George. Sometimes they asked for help securing employment, sometimes they asked for money, sometimes they asked for emotional support, and sometimes they asked for feedback on their writing.
Beyond that, Caroline’s story reveals what several recent biographies of “the woman behind/beside the man” also underscore. (See Iris Jamahl Dunkle’s Charmian Kittredge London: Trailblazer, Author, Adventurer and Celia Stahr’s Frida in America: The Creative Awakening of a Great Artist, for example. More on these below). The woman’s “coming of age” occurs in a dramatic way but often at a slower pace and later in life—largely because she was acculturated to believe her husband’s life and career more important than hers. This ingrained humility among many women takes time to rise to the surface and shed, like an old skin. And it often occurs after some dramatic moments of awakening to this “lesser” status as learned behavior. Something erupts–in the marriage, the spouse’s profession or in health—which leads to some thoughtful decision making about how to proceed. Caroline’s vision of herself as a forceful presence and a writer comes into focus upon her return from Turkey, after George’s appointment to the Ottoman Empire ends on a sour note in 1854. I believe her turning point was an encounter with Elizabeth Barrett Browning in Italy, a widely read poet whose verses were a form of activism to alleviate social ills. **
Unique to Caroline’s story of developing agency, however, her self-proclaimed “invalid” health creates a picture of an interabled couple. This aspect of her life with George distinguishes the biography I am writing. Caroline lives for years with periodic presenting symptoms such as inabilities to see, to stand and to walk. In Paris, George rolls her through the Louvre in a wheelchair, and carries her up and down stairs when necessary. Caroline’s conditions improve after a surgery for a benign uterine tumor and an eye treatment when she is in her forties. But the way in which she negotiates her marriage, her travels, and her later vocation as an author are all influenced by this “invalid” status.
How did you get interested in American women in Italy in the nineteenth century?
A Fulbright award to teach in Sicily in 2009 spurred the ideas for my forthcoming book, Engaging Italy: American Women’s Utopian Visions and Transnational Networks, which includes Marsh along with two other women (more below). I had been teaching nineteenth-century American literature for years, and I knew many authors such as Nathaniel Hawthorne, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Mark Twain, Henry James and Edith Wharton wrote about Americans in Italy based on their time abroad. And I had been in Italy a few times before—first as a university student. But as I lived abroad as a middle-aged adult, for a period that extended beyond a short tourist jaunt, and in a locale without as many tourists, I began to consider expatriate life—beyond the typical 19th century, educational “Grand Tour,” which had a predictable itinerary and limited time span. Living abroad beyond undergraduate studies or a brief vacation is different. I became especially troubled by the language James and Twain used to describe Americans abroad—as part of a “museum” or “spectacle.” While I could visualize American tourists in that light, I also knew that there were American women such as war correspondent Margaret Fuller who had different experiences in Italy—they were more “engaged” than disengaged from the local culture.
So I began to explore the stories of women who were more than tourists abroad. They followed what I call “later vocations” — they followed their callings to act, taking them on paths much different from the typical tourist. The three women in Engaging Italy (which I refer to as a collective, slice-of-life biography)–Marsh, Anne Hampton Brewster and Emily Bliss Gould—were in Italy during a period of political and social upheaval known as Unification. Each lived abroad for more than fifteen years and seized opportunities to be engaged in these moments of change. Brewster wrote weekly for US newspapers in Boston, Philadelphia, and across the country. Gould wrote for two periodicals before devoting her attention fully to establishing an industrial school and orphanage and fundraising for it. Marsh, as ambassador’s wife and serving the public as needed, also oversaw teachers for a girls’ school and orphanage, chaired committees affiliated with it, and managed a household full of family and guests.
Notably, none of these three women had biological children, and one never married—although she had several opportunities for intimate relationships. Part of their stories, then, centers upon women’s expected responsibilities and behaviors in the nineteenth century, which I believe still resonate today. How and why do women make choices to act in their professions or in the public sphere at different points in their lives? And was their time abroad merely an easy escape by white women of privilege, choosing to live in Italy in an era when the Civil War was raging in the US and then, afterward, when the nation was being rebuilt?
That’s a long answer to your question—obviously, the interest was prompted by my own experiences abroad, my prior teaching and writing in American literature, and many questions about my position at mid-life as a woman with a career and family.
What work of women’s history have you read lately that you loved? (Or for that matter, what work of women’s history have you loved in any format? )
I mentioned earlier these biographies of “women behind the men”–on artist Frida Kahlo, who came to the US because of her husband, and Charmian Kittredge London, who did a lot of her husband Jack’s writing and editing. I recommend them to anyone interested in this theme. Both books are written by academics—well-researched and documented—but are highly readable. Stahr and Dunkle place Frida and Charmian, respectively, into the worlds of art and literature. But at the same time the authors place the women into the larger context of the American social fabric and global travels and connections. We see these women of the early twentieth century not isolated in domestic spaces but connected to culture that extends beyond the walls of artist’s studio and writer’s garret. Most importantly, we see the fortitude that drew their spouses (and others) to them and the women’s growing passions for their work. Their growing agency speaks to everyone who knows what it feels like to have doubts about abilities and purpose. I think that’s just about everyone!
My question for Pamela: You write vividly and regularly–about women’s history and history in general. I believe you blog at least twice a week and also write newsletters. I know your early January blog lists topics you’ll cover during the year. Do you ever worry about running out of topics? How do you come up with your ideas? And how far out do you line them up?
I am endlessly curious and find ideas pretty much every where. Something catches my imagination or makes me question something I thought I knew. (Write a history blog twice a week for a number of years and you will be astounded at the depth and breadth of your own ignorance.) I read a book or visit an exhibit that I want to share. I have an odd bit that doesn’t fit into a project I’m working on. Quite frankly, I don’t worry about running out of topics as long as I am reading, visiting museums and historical sites, and interacting with people doing interesting things related to history. And I intend to do all those things as long as I am able. (I don’t know about anyone else, but I eager to hit the road again.)
I have a long list of story ideas that I think might make good blog posts.*** When an idea catches my imagination, I open a document for it in the Scrivener project that serves me as an”editorial calendar”. If I’m lucky, I have a few thoughts of how it might go and a reference or two. Sometimes it is just a name or a few words. And even with that long list, there are days when a blog post is due and I’ve got nothing.
How far out do I have them lined up? (pauses to laugh) In the best of all possible worlds, I would have blog posts written several weeks out, but in fact I sometimes usually scramble to meet my own deadline.
*Full disclosure, Etta is a much better gardener than I am. Her posts about her garden make me feel like a garden slacker. Which I am.
**I don’t know about you, but I am now inspired to re-read some Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s poetry.
***I also have a large “dud” folder full of blog posts that didn’t work out. I can’t quite bring myself to trash them, because sometimes they come back to life.
* * *
Want to know more about Etta Madden and her work?
For more on Caroline Crane Marsh, see Ambasciatrice, Activist, Auntie, Author: Caroline Crane Marsh and Travels, Translations and Limitations: Ambasciatrice Caroline Crane Marsh.
For more on Anne Hampton Brewster, see the blog post Nineteenth-Century News from Rome and a Library Company Fireside Chat video, Mediterranean Quarantine: Perspectives of a Person of Privilege.
Check out Etta’s website and her blog on women in Italy and other topics Italian and utopian at ettamadden.com
Follow her on Facebook: Etta Madden Author
Follow her on Twitter: @ettamadden
Follow her on Instagram: ettamadden
* * *
Come back tomorrow for three questions and an answer with historian Daphne Geanacopoulos. We’re talking about pirates from a unexpected perspective.
Getting Ready to Party Like It’s Women’s History Month
This isn’t really a blog post. It’s an announcement of coming attractions.
In case you missed the memo, March is Women’s History Month in the United States.
Like most of the people I know who work in and around women’s history, I have mixed feelings about it. I love the fact that libraries, schools, community groups and mainstream media are inspired to celebrate the achievements of women: the famous, the infamous, the forgotten, the erased. (There is even an official government website devoted to it. https://womenshistorymonth.gov/) I hate the fact that as a culture we still see women’s history as something apart rather than simply history.
But the realities being what they are, we’re going to celebrate Women’s History Month here in the Margins the same way we’ve celebrated for the last two years, with a series of mini-interviews with people who write about or otherwise work with women’s history. Unlike the rest of the year, there will be new posts Monday through Friday. (If you want to rev yourself up, you can read all the previous interviews here.)
I’ve got a great mix of people lined up to talk about a wide range women, from queens to con artists. First up on Monday: English professor Etta Madden, talking about American women in Italy in the nineteenth century and the challenges of writing about someone best known as the “wife of”.
Pull out your party hats and noisemakers and get ready to read! We’re going to have Big Fun.
Civilian Internment Camps in World War I (Not a Typo)
Until recently, I thought of internment camps only in terms of the shameful removal and imprisonment of Japanese Americans by the United States government, which saw concentrated populations of people of Japanese descent as a security risk, based on no evidence what so ever.* Several years ago, thanks to the excellent BBC mystery series Foyle’s War, my vision of World War II internment camps expanded to include the British internment of German nationals as “enemy aliens “ for much the same reasons. But I still thought of internment camps for civilians as something that happened in World War II.
To my surprise, it turns out that the internment of enemy aliens was a thing in World War I as well.** Together, combatant nations on both sides of the war, including the United States, interned more than 400,000 civilians of enemy nationality over the course of the war. Unlike the Japanese interment in World War II, most of the interned civilians were men.***
The United States was a relatively small player in the internment game, but it was definitely a player.
America’s entry into the war was accompanied by an outbreak of nativism and xenophobia directed at German immigrants and Americans of German dissent. (I suspect it had been simmering under the surface for a long time. Germans were the largest non-English speaking population and the most successful immigrant population at the time.) German books were removed from public library shelves. German classes were abruptly dropped from public schools.**** Citizens of German descent were subjected to vigilante action and in at least once case a German immigrant was lynched by a drunken mob.
Soon after the United States entered the war, Woodrow Wilson used the 1798 Alien Enemy Act to impose a series of restriction on German nationals. They were banned from entering “forbidden zones”, required to register with the police or the local postmaster, and forbidden to own radios or firearms. The restrictions were soon extended to included citizens of the Austro-Hungarian empire and all female enemy aliens. German residents were kept under surveillance for violations of these restrictions, by their neighbors as well as by the authorities, and police round-ups were common. Over the course of the war, more than 10,000 German residents were arrested. Most were released after a brief investigation, but about 2,300 German and Austrian nationals were held in internment camps, including twenty-nine musicians from the Boston symphony orchestra. About ten percent were wealthy German born immigrants suspected of financing pro-German propaganda. Fifteen were women suspected of “aiding the enemy”—a phrase that I assume means spying in this context. Most were working class men who had been involved in radical politics or labor unrest.
A majority of the internees were released in June 1919, but some remained in custody as late as April 1920. (Just a reminder: the war ended in November, 1918.)
The internment camps of World War I differed significantly from those of World War II, but both were based on the belief that national descent or ethnicity could define loyalty. That belief–expanded to include religion–has been a common thread in our national defense policy ever since. *sigh*
* In the course of digging around on the subject of enemy internment I learned that two Japanese internment camps were located in southeastern Arkansas—which definitely didn’t fit into my understanding of this ugly piece of American history. Arkansas State University has created a museum and memorial on the site of one of the camps. (Check it out here: https://rohwer.astate.edu/ )When things open up again, we’re heading out on more road trips through history. This is now on the list.
** Perhaps this is something everyone knows and I was reading a book about something else in the back of American history class the day we covered it. (Thanks to alphabetical order I often sat in a back corner of the room, which made it easy to hold an open book on my lap when things were dull. I’m not naming any names, but this was true all too often in my American history class even though I was predisposed to be interested. )
***This did not mean that women and children were unaffected. Left behind when their male relatives were interned, they suffered financially from the loss of a primary bread-winner and from the social stigma attached to being “dangerous” foreigners. Not to mention the emotional trauma of having a father, son or brother taken away. The assumption that war is experienced only by men is built on a narrow definition of war.
****It wasn’t restored in my hometown school system until my junior year of high school. Hatred has a long, invisible tail.













